MeasTex: Comparisons of Algorithms


The MeasTex framework computes a scalar measure of an algorithm's classification performance on a suite of texture problems. Given these quantitative measures, it is possible to compare different algorithms.

We have summarised the measures for the following comparisons:

Major paradigms
GLCM vs Markov vs Gabor
Variations of Gabor
Wide vs Narrow Gaussian envelopes
Varying number of frequencies measured
Variations of Markov
Varying Markov mask
Variations of GLCM
Varying distance parameter
Ohanian and Dubes Comparisons
Comparisons of algorithms similar to Ohanian and Dubes
Note: The scores quoted in these results were obtained using the performance measure described elsewhere. A score of 1 indicates that the algorithm got the task completely right whereas a score of 0 indicates that the algorithm was completely wrong. Because the measure combines confidence and correctness, a range of results between these extremes is possible.


Return to MeasTex Homepage
Return to TextureSynthesis Homepage


Guy Smith guy@it.uq.edu.au
Ian Burns burns@it.uq.edu.au

Last Modified: Tue May 27 17:34:28 EST 1997